CASE OF YASAK v. TÜRKİYE

CASE OF YASAK v. TÜRKİYE

Application No: 17389/20

Articles: 35, 35-1, 35-3-a, 7, 7-1, 3, 41

Respondent state: TUR

Date: 2026-05-05

Conclusion:

Preliminary objection dismissed (Art.

35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies; (Art. 35-3-a) Abuse of the right of application; Violation of Article 7 - No punishment without law (Article 7-1 - Nulla poena sine lege; Nullum crimen sine lege); Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect); Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction); Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction); Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction)

Subject classification: Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012; Bosti v. Italy (dec.), no. 43952/09, § 55, 13 November 2014; Canali v. France, no. 40119/09, § 50, 25 April 2013; Del Río Prada v. Spain [GC], no. 42750/09, 21 October 2013; Delga v. France, no. 38998/20, § 77, 9 July 2024; Demirhan and Others v. Türkiye, nos. 1595/20 and 238 others, § 53, 22 July 2025; G.I.E.M. S.r.l. and Others v. Italy (just satisfaction) [GC], nos. 1828/06 and others, 12 July 2023; G.I.E.M. S.r.l. and Others v. Italy [GC], nos. 1828/06 and 2 others, 28 June 2018; Harakchiev and Tolumov v. Bulgaria, nos. 15018/11 and 61199/12, § 185, ECHR 2014 (extracts); Iatridis v. Greece (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 31107/96, § 55, ECHR 2000 XI; İlerde and Others v. Türkiye, nos. 35614/19 and 10 others, 5 December 2023; J.M.B. and Others v. France, nos. 9671/15 and 31 others, § 167, 30 January 2020; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 97, ECHR 2002 VI; Karácsony and Others v. Hungary [GC], nos. 42461/13 and 44357/13, § 189, 17 May 2016; Khodorkovskiy and Lebedev v. Russia (no. 2), nos. 42757/07 and 51111/07, 14 January 2020; Khodorkovskiy and Lebedev v. Russia, nos. 11082/06 and 13772/05, 25 July 2013; Kovačević v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], no. 43651/22, § 131, 25 June 2025; Merabishvili v. Georgia [GC], no. 72508/13, § 371, 28 November 2017; Miroļubovs and Others v. Latvia, no. 798/05, 15 September 2009; Molla Sali v. Greece (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 20452/14, § 32, 18 June 2020; Muršić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, 20 October 2016; Murtazaliyeva v. Russia [GC], no. 36658/05, § 88, 18 December 2018; Nagmetov v. Russia [GC], no. 35589/08, 30 March 2017; Navalnyye v. Russia, no. 101/15, § 58, 17 October 2017; Pagerie v. France, no. 24203/16, § 149, 19 January 2023; Pantalon v. Croatia, no. 2953/14, § 48, 19 November 2020; Pisano v. Italy (Striking out) [GC], no. 36732/97, §§ 26-27, 24 October 2002; Rohlena v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 59552/08, § 55, ECHR 2015; S.A.S. v. France [GC], no. 43835/11, § 66, ECHR 2014 (extracts); Saakashvili v. Georgia, nos. 6232/20 and 22394/20, § 144, 23 May 2024; Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, 17 September 2009; Similarly, in Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, nos. 68762/14 and 71200/14, § 125, 20 September 2018; Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044/96 and 2 others, ECHR 2001-II; Sud Fondi S.r.l. and Others v. Italy, no. 75909/01, § 116, 20 January 2009; Szafrański v. Poland, no. 17249/12, § 39, 15 December 2015; Ulemek v. Croatia, no. 21613/16, 31 October 2019; Varvara v. Italy, no. 17475/09, § 71, 29 October 2013; Vasilescu v. Belgium, no. 64682/12, 25 November 2014; Yakovenko v. Ukraine, no. 15825/06, § 85, 25 October 2007; Yüksel Yalçınkaya v. Türkiye [GC], no. 15669/20, 26 September 2023; Žaja v. Croatia, no. 37462/09, §§ 91 and 92, 4 October 2016