CASE OF CENGIZ v. TÜRKİYE

CASE OF CENGIZ v. TÜRKİYE

Application No: 25406/22

Articles: 8, 8-1, 8-2, 41

Respondent state: TUR

Date: 2026-10-13

Conclusion:

Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence; Respect for family life; Respect for private life); Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction); Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction)

Subject classification: Allan v. the United Kingdom, no 48539/99, ECHR 2002 IX; Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 58170/13 and 2 others, § 333, 25 May 2021; Dalban v. Romania [GC], no 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999 VI; Doerga v. the Netherlands, no 50210/99, 27 April 2004; Gullotti v. Italy, no 64753/14, § 33, 10 July 2025; Karabeyoğlu v. Turkey, no 30083/10, § 39, 7 June 2016; Khoroshenko v. Russia [GC], no 41418/04, 30 June 2015; Lavents v. Latvia, no 58442/00, § 141, 28 November 2002; Mehmet Çiftci v. Turkey, no 53208/19, § 26, 16 November 2021; Messina v. Italy (no 2), no 25498/94, ECHR 2000 X; P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no 44787/98, §§ 59 and 60, ECHR 2001-IX; Płoski v. Poland, no 26761/95, § 35, 12 November 2002; Schemkamper v. France, no 75833/01, § 30, 18 October 2005; Scordino v. Italy (no 1) [GC], no 36813/97, § 180, ECHR 2006 V; Ships Waste Oil Collector B.V. and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no 2799/16 and 3 others, §§ 158 and 182, 1 April 2025; Subaşı and Others v. Türkiye, nos. 3468/20 and 18 others, 6 December 2022; Terrazzoni v. France, no 33242/12, § 52, 29 June 2017; Uzun v. Germany, no 35623/05, §§ 60-63, ECHR 2010 (extracts); Voynov v. Russia, no 39747/10, § 49, 3 July 2018; Wisse v. France, no 71611/01, 20 December 2005