CASE OF GREEN ALLIANCE v. BULGARIA - [Romanian translation] by the SCM Romania and IER
Ամփոփում
App. No: 6580/22 | Article: 34, 35, 35-1, 8, 8-1, 8-2, 41 | Respondent: BGR | Date: 2026-02-17 | Conclusion: Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications; (Art. 34) Victim; Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence; Respect for home); Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction)
Ամբողջ Տեքստ
CASE OF GREEN ALLIANCE v. BULGARIA - [Romanian translation] by the SCM Romania and IER
Application No: 6580/22
Articles: 34, 35, 35-1, 8, 8-1, 8-2, 41
Respondent state: BGR
Date: 2026-02-17
Conclusion:
Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed (Art.
34) Individual applications; (Art.
34) Victim; Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for correspondence; Respect for home); Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction)
Subject classification: Algirdas Butkevičius v. Lithuania, no. 70489/17, § 63, 14 June 2022; Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, § 44, ECHR 2000-II; Antunes Rocha v. Portugal, no. 64330/01, § 77, 31 May 2005; Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540/00, 28 June 2007; Bernh Larsen Holding AS and Others v. Norway, no. 24117/08, 14 March 2013; Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 58170/13 and 2 others, §§ 409-10, 25 May 2021; Breyer v. Germany, no. 50001/12, §§ 105 and 107, 30 January 2020; Brito Ferrinho Bexiga Villa-Nova v. Portugal, no. 69436/10, §§ 33-35, 1 December 2015; Buck v. Germany, no. 41604/98, § 31, ECHR 2005-I; Bykov v. Russia [GC], no. 4378/02, § 78, 10 March 2009; Centrum för rättvisa v. Sweden [GC], no. 35252/08, 25 May 2021; Copland v. the United Kingdom, no. 62617/00, § 41, ECHR 2007-I; DELTA PEKÁRNY a.s. v. the Czech Republic, no. 97/11, § 77, 2 October 2014; Ekimdzhiev and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 70078/12, 11 January 2022; Halford v. the United Kingdom, 25 June 1997, § 44, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 III; Heino v. Finland, no. 56720/09, § 33, 15 February 2011; Hüttl v. Hungary [Committee], no. 58032/16, §§ 15-18, 29 September 2022; Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no. 31107/96, § 47 in fine, ECHR 1999-II; Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, § 57, Series A no. 28; Klaus Müller v. Germany, no. 24173/18, § 37, 19 November 2020; Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, § 50, Reports 1998-II; Liblik and Others v. Estonia, nos. 173/15 and 5 others, § 110, 28 May 2019; Lindstrand Partners Advokatbyrå AB v. Sweden, no. 18700/09, § 83, 20 December 2016; Lüdi v. Switzerland, 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238; M.N. and Others v. San Marino, no. 28005/12, 7 July 2015; Michaud v. France, no. 12323/11, § 90, ECHR 2012; Molla Sali v. Greece (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 20452/14, § 32, 18 June 2020; Naumenko and SIA Rix Shipping v. Latvia, no. 50805/14, 23 June 2022; Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 32, Series A no. 251-B; Pietrzak and Bychawska-Siniarska and Others v. Poland, nos. 72038/17 and 25237/18, 28 May 2024; Pine Valley Developments Ltd and Others v. Ireland, 29 November 1991, § 48, Series A no. 222; R.E. v. the United Kingdom, no. 62498/11, §§ 126-30, 27 October 2015; Ringler v. Austria (dec.) [Committee], no. 2309/10, §§ 72-79, 15 May 2020; Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], no. 47143/06, ECHR 2015; Saber v. Norway, no. 459/18, § 48, 17 December 2020; Saint-Paul Luxembourg S.A. v. Luxembourg, no. 26419/10, § 37, 18 April 201; Sallinen and Others v. Finland, no. 50882/99, § 70, 27 September 2005; Särgava v. Estonia, no. 698/19, § 85, 16 November 2021; Sérvulo & Associados – Sociedade de Advogados, RL and Others v. Portugal, no. 27013/10, § 76, 3 September 2015; Ships Waste Oil Collector B.V. and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 2799/16 and 3 others, 1 April 2025; Société Colas Est and Others v. France, no. 37971/97, § 41, ECHR 2002-III; Sommer v. Germany, no. 73607/13, 27 April 2017; Szabó and Vissy v. Hungary, no. 37138/14, § 82, 12 January 2016; UAB Kesko Senukai Lithuania v. Lithuania, no. 19162/19, § 109, 4 April 2023; Uzun v. Germany, no. 35623/05, § 66, ECHR 2010; Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064/90 and 8 others, § 224, ECHR 2009; Verliere v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 41953/98, ECHR 2001-VII; Veselov and Others v. Russia, nos. 23200/10 and 2 others, §§ 50 and 62, 2 October 2012; Vinci Construction and GTM Génie Civil et Services v. France, nos. 63629/10 and 60567/10, § 63, 2 April 2015; Vukota-Bojić v. Switzerland, no. 61838/10, § 59, 18 October 2016; Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934/00, § 135, ECHR 2006-XI; Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336/01, § 45, ECHR 2007-IV; Zlínsat, spol. s r.o., v. Bulgaria, no. 57785/00, § 55 in fine, 15 June 2006
PDF Փաստաթուղթ
Բացել PDF-ը նոր ներդիրում* Դատարանի PDF-ը կարող է պարունակել անձնական տվյալների պաշտոնական ծածկագրություն (սև շերտեր)։ Ամբողջական տեքստը հասանելի է վերևում «Ամբողջ Տեքստ» բաժնում։
Տեղեկանք
- Ամսաթիվ:
- 17 փետրվարի, 2026 թ.
- Գործի #:
- 6580/22
- Դատարան:
- Մարդու իրավունքների եվրոպական դատարան
Նմանատիպ գործեր
Գտեք նմանատիպ դատական ակտեր AI վերլուծությամբ
