CASE OF MLADINA D.D. LJUBLJANA v. SLOVENIA (No 2) - [Ukrainian translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine

CASE OF MLADINA D.D. LJUBLJANA v. SLOVENIA (No 2) - [Ukrainian translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine Application No: 43388/17

Articles: 10, 10-1, 10-2, 41, 8, 8-1

Respondent state: SVN

Date: 2026-01-13

Conclusion:

Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression); Pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction); Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction)

Subject classification: Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876/08, § 119, ECHR 2013 (extracts); Annen v. Germany (no. 6), no. 3779/11, §§ 22-23, 18 October 2018; Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, §§ 78-95 and 101, 7 February 2012; Bédat v. Switzerland [GC], no. 56925/08, §§ 48 and 72, 29 March 2016; Couderc and Hachette Filipacchi Associés v. France [GC], no. 40454/07, §§ 79 and 90 93, ECHR 2015 (extracts); Cumpǎnǎ and Mazǎre v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, § 102, ECHR 2004 XI; Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569/09, § 139, ECHR 2015; Eerikäinen and Others v. Finland, no. 3514/02, § 70, 10 February 2009; Fuchsmann v. Germany, no. 71233/13, § 30, 19 October 2017; Gaspari v. Slovenia, no. 21055/03, § 83, 21 July 2009; Grebneva and Alisimchik v. Russia, no. 8918/05, §§ 59 and 62, 22 November 2016; Halet v. Luxembourg [GC], no. 21884/18, § 110, 14 February 2023; Handzhiyski v. Bulgaria, no. 10783/14, § 51, 6 April 2021; Hrachya Harutyunyan v. Armenia, no. 15028/16, § 37, 27 August 2024; Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, § 31, Series A no. 298; Khural and Zeynalov v. Azerbaijan, no. 55069/11, § 39, 6 October 2022; Lopes Gomes da Silva v. Portugal, no. 37698/97, § 34, ECHR 2000-X; M.L. v. Slovakia, no. 34159/17, § 41, 14 October 2021; Mediengruppe Österreich GmbH v. Austria, no. 37713/18, § 51, 26 April 2022; Medžlis Islamske Zajednice Brčko and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], no. 17224/11, §§ 66-67 and §§ 77-79, 27 June 2017; Milosavljević v. Serbia, no. 57574/14, § 59, 25 May 2021; Mladina d.d. Ljubljana v. Slovenia, no. 20981/10, §§ 43 and 46-47, 17 April 2014; Murphy v. Ireland, no. 44179/98, § 69, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts); Nikowitz and Verlagsgruppe News GmbH v. Austria, no. 5266/03, § 25, 22 February 2007; Pricope v. Romania, no. 60183/17, § 58, 30 May 2023; Radio France and Others v. France, no. 53984/00, § 39, ECHR 2004-II; Ringier Axel Springer Slovakia, a.s. v. Slovakia (no. 3), no. 37986/09, § 77, 7 January 2014; Rothe v. Austria, no. 6490/07, §§ 54 and 73, 4 December 2012; Saaristo and Others v. Finland, no. 184/06, §§ 56-57, 12 October 2010; Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland [GC], no. 931/13, § 166, 27 June 2017; Scharsach and News Verlagsgesellschaft v. Austria, no. 39394/98, §§ 43-45, ECHR 2003-XI; Sousa Goucha v. Portugal, no. 70434/12, § 50, 22 March 2016; Stancu and Others v. Romania, no. 22953/16, § 147, 18 October 2022; Tønsbergs Blad A.S. and Haukom v. Norway, no. 510/04, § 87, 1 March 2007; Tuşalp v. Turkey, nos. 32131/08 and 41617/08, § 57, 21 February 2012; Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, §§ 95-113, ECHR 2012; Von Hannover (no. 3), no. 8772/10, § 46, 19 September 2013; Wabl v. Austria, no. 24773/94, 21 March 2000; Wirtschafts Trend Zeitschriften-Verlagsgesellschaft mbH v. Austria (no. 3), nos. 66298/01 and 15653/02, § 44, 13 December 2005; Zemmour v. France, no. 63539/19, § 62, 20 December 2022; Zybertowicz v. Poland, no. 59138/10, § 48, 17 January 2017