CASE OF FAL v. SPAIN - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)

CASE OF FAL v. SPAIN - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM) Application No: 25828/23

Articles: 35, 35-3-a, 8, 8-1, 8-2, 2

Respondent state: ESP

Date: 2026-05-12

Conclusion:

Remainder inadmissible (Art.

35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded; No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Expulsion; Article 8-1 - Respect for family life; Respect for private life)

Subject classification: A and B v. Norway [GC], nos. 24130/11 and 29758/11, § 133, 15 November 2016; De Souza Ribeiro v. France [GC], no. 22689/07, § 77, ECHR 2012; Kaushal and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 1537/08, § 28, 2 September 2010; Liu v. Russia (no. 2), no. 29157/09, §§ 84 et 86, 26 July 2011; Ljatifi v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 19017/16, §§ 33-35, 17 May 2018; M.A. v. Denmark [GC], no. 6697/18, §§ 132 and 149, 9 July 2021; Marguš v. Croatia [GC], no. 4455/10, § 128, ECHR 2014 (extracts); Maslov v. Austria [GC], no. 1638/03, § 68, ECHR 2008; Mirzoyan v. the Czech Republic, nos. 15117/21 and 15689/21, § 82, 16 May 2024; Muhammad and Muhammad v. Romania [GC], no. 80982/12, §§ 203 06, 15 October 2020; Savran v. Denmark [GC], no. 57467/15, §§ 182, 189 and 199, 7 December 2021; Siles Cabrera v. Spain, no. 5212/23, §§ 73 and 81, 17 July 2025; Slivenko v. Latvia [GC], no. 48321/99, §§ 94-95, ECHR 2003-X; Trapitsyna and Isaeva v. Hungary, no. 5488/22, 19 September 2024; Üner v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 46410/99, §§ 57-58, ECHR 2006-XII; Winther v. Denmark, no. 9588/21, §§ 43-44, 12 November 2024