CASE OF KRYUK v. UKRAINE

CASE OF KRYUK v. UKRAINE

Application No: 50474/20, 50480/20

Articles: 35, 35-3-a, 5, 5-3, 5-5, 41, 3

Respondent state: UKR

Date: 2026-03-05

Conclusion:

Remainder inadmissible (Art.

35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded; (Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae; Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention); Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-5 - Compensation); Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction)

Subject classification: Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no. 23755/07, § 104, 5 July 2016; Erdoğan Yağız v. Turkey, no. 27473/02, § 37, 6 March 2007; Ilnseher v. Germany [GC], nos. 10211/12 and 27505/14, § 254, 4 December 2018; Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 67, ECHR 2006 IX; Korban v. Ukraine (no. 26744/16, §§ 154-57, 4 July 2019; Korneykova v. Ukraine, no. 39884/05, § 80, 19 January 2012; Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 92-94, ECHR 2000-XI; Kummer v. the Czech Republic, no. 32133/11, § 64, 25 July 2013; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV; Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09 and 2 others, §§ 220-26, ECHR 2014 (extracts); Olekseychuk v. Ukraine [Committee], no. 5765/20, §§ 15-20, 15 December 2022; Rytikov v. Ukraine, no. 52855/19, §§ 32-37, 23 May 2024; Stoichkov v. Bulgaria, no. 9808/02, § 72, 24 March 2005; Strogan v. Ukraine, no. 30198/11, §§ 107-10, 6 October 2016; Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts); Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, § 32, Series A no. 26