CASE OF C.P. v. SPAIN - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)

CASE OF C.P. v. SPAIN - [German Translation] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM) Application No: 50181/22

Articles: 35, 35-3-a, 8, 8-1, 8-2

Respondent state: ESP

Date: 2026-06-11

Conclusion:

Remainder inadmissible (Art.

35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-3-a) Ratione materiae; No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)

Subject classification: A, B and C v. Ireland [GC], no. 25579/05, § 238, ECHR 2010; Aftanache v. Romania, no. 999/19, 26 May 2020; Ageyevy v. Russia, no. 7075/10, § 122, 18 April 2013; Altay v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 11236/09, § 54, 9 April 2019; Bogumil v. Portugal, no. 35228/03, §§ 90-91, 7 October 2008; Communauté genevoise d’action syndicale (CGAS) v. Switzerland [GC], no. 21881/20, § 160, 27 November 2023; Creangă v. Romania [GC], no. 29226/03, § 93, 23 February 2012; Danileţ v. Romania [GC], no. 16915/21, § 122, 15 December 2025; Dubská and Krejzová v. the Czech Republic [GC], nos. 28859/11 and 28473/12, 15 November 2016; Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339/05, § 77 in fine, ECHR 2007 I; Gillan and Quinton v. the United Kingdom, no. 4158/05, § 57, ECHR 2010 (extracts); Glass v. the United Kingdom, no. 61827/00, § 81, ECHR 2004-II; Guenat v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 24722/94, Commission decision of 10 April 1995; Guzzardi v. Italy, 6 November 1980, § 95, Series A no. 39; H.M. v. Switzerland, no. 39187/98, § 45, ECHR 2002‑II; Hanzelkovi v. the Czech Republic, no. 43643/10, § 76, 11 December 2014; Kosaitė-Čypienė and Others v. Lithuania, 4 June 2019; Leyla Şahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774/98, §§ 91 and 94, ECHR 2005-XI; M.A. v. Cyprus, no. 41872/10, §§ 190 and 193, ECHR 2013 (extracts); Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary [GC], no. 18030/11, § 184, 8 November 2016; Mayboroda v. Ukraine, no. 14709/07, §56, 13 April 2023; Mehmet Ulusoy and Others v. Turkey, no. 54969/09, §§ 83-84, 25 June 2019; Michaud v. France, no. 12323/11, § 96, ECHR 2012; Nada v. Switzerland [GC], no. 10593/08, § 225, ECHR 2012; O.G. v. Latvia (dec.), no. 6752/13, § 29, 30 June 2015; Pindo Mulla v. Spain [GC], no. 15541/20, 17 September 2024; Pojatina v. Croatia, no. 18568/12, § 80, 4 October 2018; S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 94, ECHR 2008; Sanchez v. France [GC], no. 45581/15, 15 May 2023; Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland [GC], no. 931/13, §§ 144 and 147, 27 June 2017; Ships Waste Oil Collector B.V. and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 2799/16 and 3 others, §§ 152 and 168, 1 April 2025; Siedlecka v. Poland, no. 13375/18, §58, 31 July 2025; Stanev v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 36760/06, § 117, ECHR 2012; Stelian Roşca v. Romania, no. 5543/06, § 60, 4 June 2013; Ternovszky v. Hungary, no. 67545/09, § 22, 14 December 2010; Udaltsov v. Russia, no. 76695/11, §§ 130 and 136, 6 October 2020; Ulisei Grosu v. Romania, no. 60113/12, §§ 27-32, 22 March 2016; Vadym Melnyk v. Ukraine, nos. 62209/17 and 50933/18, § 84, 16 September 2022; Vavřička and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], nos. 47621/13 and 5 others, §§ 274 and 282, 8 April 2021; Venskutė v. Lithuania, no. 10645/08, § 73, 11 December 2012; Versaci v. Italy, no. 3795/22, § 112, 15 May 2025; Zelčs v. Latvia, no. 65367/16, § 37, 20 February 2020