CASE OF BAYBASIN v. THE NETHERLANDS (No. 2)

CASE OF BAYBASIN v. THE NETHERLANDS (No. 2)

Application No: 36384/22

Articles: 3, 8, 8-1, 8-2

Respondent state: NLD

Date: 2026-10-06

Conclusion:

No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect); No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life)

Subject classification: Adamčo v. Slovakia (no. 2), no. 55792/20, § 81, 12 December 2024; Baybaşin v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 13600/02, 6 October 2005; Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, §§ 100-01, ECHR 2015; Campbell v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1992, §§ 46-48, Series A no. 233; Casado Coca v. Spain, 24 February 1994, §§ 52-54, Series A no. 285-A; Dejnek v. Poland, no. 9635/13, 1 June 2017; Frérot v. France, no. 70204/01, §§ 38 and 47, 12 June 2007; Iwańczuk v. Poland, no. 25196/94, §§ 57-59, 15 November 2011; Jaeger v. Estonia, no. 1574/13, 31 July 2014; Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, § 73, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV; Morice v. France [GC], no. 29369/10, §§ 133-34, ECHR 2015; Namazli v. Azerbaijan, no. 8826/20, §§ 47 and 51, 20 June 2024; Petrov v. Bulgaria, no. 15197/02, § 44, 22 May 2008; Rodriguez Ravelo v. Spain, no. 48074/10, § 40, 12 January 2016; Roth v. Germany, nos. 6780/18 and 30776/18, 22 October 2020; S.J. v. Luxembourg (no. 2), no. 47229/12, §§ 55 and 59, 31 October 2013; Saber v. Norway, no. 459/18, §§ 52 and 55, 17 December 2020; Särgava v. Estonia, no. 698/19, §§ 98-99, 16 November 2021; Saribekyan and Balyan v. Azerbaijan, no. 35746/11, § 81, 30 January 2020; Steur v. the Netherlands, no. 39657/98, § 38, ECHR 2003-XI; Sylla v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 14683/03, 6 October 2005; Valašinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 117, 25 July 2001; Van der Ven v. the Netherlands, no. 50901/99, ECHR 2003-II