CASE OF ZINCHENKO AND TAMTURA v. UKRAINE

CASE OF ZINCHENKO AND TAMTURA v. UKRAINE

Application No: 46839/17, 74462/17

Articles: 35, 35-3-a, 5, 5-3, 3

Respondent state: UKR

Date: 2026-03-05

Conclusion:

Remainder inadmissible (Art.

35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded; Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Reasonableness of pre-trial detention)

Subject classification: Buzadji v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no. 23755/07, § 104, 5 July 2016; Erdoğan Yağız v. Turkey, no. 27473/02, § 37, 6 March 2007; İlhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 97, ECHR 2000 VII; Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 67, ECHR 2006 IX; Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 16483/12, § 268, 15 December 2016; Korban v. Ukraine, no. 26744/16, §§ 154-157, 4 July 2019; Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 92-94, ECHR 2000-XI; Kummer v. the Czech Republic, no. 32133/11, § 64, 25 July 2013; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV; Slivenko v. Latvia (dec.) [GC], no. 48321/99, § 101, ECHR 2002 II; Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, § 127, ECHR 2014 (extracts); Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, § 32, Series A no. 26; Yaroslav Belousov v. Russia, nos. 2653/13 and 60980/14, §§ 124 and 125, 4 October 2016