CASE OF MANKUS v. LITHUANIA

CASE OF MANKUS v. LITHUANIA

Application No: 25336/22

Articles: 37, 37-1, 37-1-a, 8, 8-1, 8-2, 41

Respondent state: LTU

Date: 2026-09-01

Conclusion:

Struck out of the list (Art.

37) Striking out applications-{general}; (Art. 37-1) Striking out applications; (Art. 37-1) Respect for human rights; (Art. 37-1-a) Absence of intention to pursue application; Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life); Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction)

Subject classification: Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, § 56, ECHR 2000 II; Černius and Rinkevičius v. Lithuania, nos. 73579/17 and 14620/18, §§ 65 74, 18 February 2020; Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639/11, §§ 92-117, 25 September 2018; Đorđević v. Serbia, no. 11212/23, § 91, 7 October 2025; Gražulevičiūtė v. Lithuania, no. 53176/17, § 95, 14 December 2021; Halford v. the United Kingdom, 25 June 1997, § 49, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 III; Jankauskas v. Lithuania (no. 2), no. 50446/09, 27 June 2017; Karov v. Bulgaria, no. 45964/99, § 88, 16 November 2006; Lekavičienė v. Lithuania, no. 48427/09, 27 June 2017; Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, §§ 66 68, Series A no. 82; Rainys and Gasparavičius v. Lithuania, nos. 70665/01 and 74345/01, § 45, 7 April 2005; Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 55, ECHR 2000 V; Rysovskyy v. Ukraine, no. 29979/04, §§ 70-71, 20 October 2011; S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, §§ 95 and 99, ECHR 2008; S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 57813/00, § 89, ECHR 2011; Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom (just satisfaction), nos. 33985/96 and 33986/96, § 18, ECHR 2000-IX