CASE OF EROL AKSOY v. TÜRKİYE - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice

CASE OF EROL AKSOY v. TÜRKİYE - [Turkish Translation] by the Turkish Ministry of Justice

Application No: 58919/18

Articles: 35, 35-3-a, 6, 6-1, 41, 46, 46-2

Respondent state: TUR

Date: 2026-02-10

Conclusion:

Remainder inadmissible (Art.

35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-3-a) Ratione personae; Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings; Article 6-1 - Access to court); Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction); Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction)

Subject classification: Advance Pharma sp. z o.o v. Poland, no. 1469/20, § 331, 3 February 2022; Agrotexim and Others v. Greece, 24 October 1995, §§ 62-66, Series A no. 330 A; Aksu v. Turkey [GC], nos. 4149/04 and 41029/04, §§ 51 and 52, ECHR 2012; Albert and Others v. Hungary [GC], no. 5294/14, 7 July 2020; Ankarcrona v. Sweden (dec.), no. 35178/97, 27 June 2000; Bitenc v. Slovenia (dec.), no. 32963/02, 18 March 2008; Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378/05, § 33, ECHR 2008; Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 33509/04, § 70, ECHR 2009; C.M. v. Belgium, no. 67957/12, § 55, 13 March 2018; Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no. 38433/09, § 92, ECHR 2012; Cıngıllı Holding A.Ş. and Cıngıllıoğlu v. Turkey, nos. 31833/06 and 37538/06, 21 July 2015; Dolińska-Ficek and Ozimek v. Poland, nos. 49868/19 and 57511/19, § 328, 8 November 2021; Dovguchits v. Russia, no. 2999/03, § 48, 7 June 2007; G.J. v. Luxembourg, no. 21156/93, §§ 23-24, 26 October 2000; Gerasimov and Others v. Russia, nos. 29920/05 and 10 others, § 198, 1 July 2014; Glas Nadezhda EOOD and Anatoliy Elenkov v. Bulgaria, no. 14134/02, § 40, ECHR 2007; Greek Federation of Customs Officers, Gialouris and others v. Greece, no. 24581/94, Commission decision of 6 April 1995, DR 81-B, p. 127; Grzęda v. Poland [GC], no. 43572/18, § 257, 15 March 2022; Hornsby v. Greece, 19 March 1997, §§ 40-41, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-II; İlhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 52, ECHR 2000-VII; Ilyushkin and Others v. Russia, nos. 5734/08 and 28 others, § 64, 17 April 2012; IZA Ltd and Makrakhidze v. Georgia, no. 28537/02, § 29, 27 September 2005; J.W. v. Poland, no. 27917/95, Commission decision of 11 September 1997, Decisions and Reports 90, p. 69; Kalinkin and Others v. Russia, nos. 16967/10 and 20 others, § 55, 17 April 2012; Kural v. Türkiye, no. 84388/17, 19 March 2024; Lungoci v. Romania, no. 62710/00, § 55, 26 January 2006; Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania [GC], no. 76943/11, § 187, ECHR 2016 (extracts); Maktouf and Damjanović v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 2312/08 and 34179/08, § 94, ECHR 2013; Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056/06, § 48, ECHR 2009; Nikoloudakis v. Greece, no. 35322/12, §§ 50 and 64, 26 March 2020; Nosov v. Russia (dec.), no. 30877/02, 20 October 2005; Olczak v. Poland (dec.), no. 30417/96, §§ 71–85, ECHR 2002-X (extracts); Penchevi v. Bulgaria, no. 77818/12, § 89, 10 February 2015; Piersack v. Belgium (Article 50), 26 October 1984, Series A no. 85, p. 16, § 12; Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 40167/06, § 63, 12 December 2017; Sharxhi and Others v. Albania, no. 10613/16, § 92, 11 January 2018; Shesti Mai Engineering OOD and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 17854/04, §§ 80–92, 20 September 2011; Süzer and Eksen Holding A.Ş. v. Turkey, no. 6334/05, §§ 95 and 116, 23 October 2012; The J. Paul Getty Trust and Others v. Italy, no. 35271/19, § 225, 2 May 2024; Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland [GC], no. 53600/20, § 459, 9 April 2024; Zehenther v. Austria, no. 20082/02, § 39, 16 July 2009