Անցնել բովանդակությանը
ariognem Logoariognem.amԻրավական օգնական
Որոնում/CASE OF MORAWIEC v. POLAND - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania
ECHR HUDOCECHRAI Ինդեքսավորված

CASE OF MORAWIEC v. POLAND - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania

Մարդու իրավունքների եվրոպական դատարան46238/205 փետրվարի, 2026 թ.Բնօրինակ աղբյուր
ՄԻԵԴ-ի շտեմարանում՝ գործի քարտը (գանգատ, պետություն, խախտված հոդվածներ), HUDOC-ը՝ բոլոր լեզուներով, հայերեն թարգմանությունը
PDF

Ամփոփում

App. No: 46238/20 | Article: 34, 6, 6-1, 8, 8-1, 8-2, 10, 10-1, 10-2, 41 | Respondent: POL | Date: 2026-02-05 | Conclusion: Preliminary objections partially dismissed (Art. 34) Individual applications; (Art. 34) Victim; Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings; Criminal proceedings; Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal; Independent tribunal; Tribunal established by law); Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life); Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freed

Ամբողջ Տեքստ

CASE OF MORAWIEC v. POLAND - [Romanian Translation] by the European Institute of Romania

Application No: 46238/20

Articles: 34, 6, 6-1, 8, 8-1, 8-2, 10, 10-1, 10-2, 41

Respondent state: POL

Date: 2026-02-05

Conclusion:

Preliminary objections partially dismissed (Art.

34) Individual applications; (Art.

34) Victim; Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings; Criminal proceedings; Article 6-1 - Impartial tribunal; Independent tribunal; Tribunal established by law); Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life); Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression); Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction); Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction)

Subject classification: Advance Pharma sp. z o.o. v. Poland, § 353, no. 1469/20, § 353, 3 February 2022; Baka v. Hungary [GC], no. 20261/12, 23 June 2016; Beck v. Norway, no. 26390/95, § 27, 26 June 2001; Camelia Bogdan v. Romania, no. 36889/18, § 70, 20 October 2020; Communauté genevoise d’action syndicale (CGAS) v. Switzerland [GC], no. 21881/20, §§ 139 and 143, 27 November 2023; Cristea v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 35098/12, § 25, 12 February 2019; Danileţ v. Romania [GC], no. 16915/21, 15 December 2025; Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639/11, 25 September 2018; Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, §§ 42 46, Series A no. 35; Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, 8 June 1976, § 82, Series A no. 22; Freimanis and Līdums v. Latvia, nos. 73443/01 and 74860/01, 9 February 2006; Friedrich and Others v. Poland, nos. 25344/20 and 17 others, § 125, 20 June 2024; Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 115, ECHR 2010; Gagliano Giorgi v. Italy, no. 23563/07, § 55, ECHR 2012 (extracts); Gashi and Gina v. Albania, no. 29943/18, §§ 56-58, 4 April 2023; Gestur Jónsson and Ragnar Halldór Hall v. Iceland [GC], nos. 68273/14 and 68271/14, § 75, 22 December 2020; Gillberg v. Sweden [GC], no. 41723/06, § 68, 3 April 2012; Grzęda v. Poland [GC], no. 43572/18, 15 March 2022; Guðmundur Andri Ástráðsson v. Iceland [GC], no. 26374/18, 1 December 2020; Gumenyuk and Others v. Ukraine, no. 11423/19, 22 July 2021; Heinisch v. Germany, no. 28274/08, § 43, ECHR 2011 (extracts); Juszczyszyn v. Poland, no. 35599/20, 6 October 2022; Karoussiotis v. Portugal, no. 23205/08, § 57, 1 February 2011; Komyakov v. Russia (dec.), no. 7100/02, 8 January 2009; Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 146, ECHR 2000 XI; Kurić and Others v. Slovenia [GC], no. 26828/06, § 259, ECHR 2012 (extracts); Magyar Kétfarkú Kutya Párt v. Hungary [GC], no. 201/17, §§ 93-96, 20 January 2020; Molla Sali v. Greece [GC], no. 20452/14, § 90, 19 December 2018; Morby v. Luxembourg (dec.), no. 27156/02, ECHR 2003 XI; Oleksy v. Poland (dec.), no. 1379/06, 16 June 2009; Osmanov and Husseinov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 54178/00, 4 September 2003; Paluda v. Slovakia, no. 33392/12, §§ 33-34, 23 May 2017; Panayotopoulos and Others v. Greece, no. 44758/20, § 90, 21 January 2025; Reczkowicz v. Poland, no. 43447/19, §§ 59 176, 22 July 2021; Rooman v. Belgium [GC], no. 18052/11, 31 January 2019; Sakhnovskiy v. Russia [GC], no. 21272/03, 2 November 2010; Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, §§ 179-80, ECHR 2006 V; Šeks v. Croatia, no. 39325/20, § 47, 3 February 2022; Selahattin Demirtaş v. Turkey (no. 2) [GC], no. 14305/17, § 218, 22 December 2020; Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378/02, § 293, ECHR 2005-III; Simeonovi v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 21980/04, §§ 110-11, 12 May 2017; Tuleya v. Poland, nos. 21181/19 and 51751/20, 6 July 2023; Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00, § 62, ECHR 2007-II; Vučković and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153/11 and 29 others, § 77, 25 March 2014; Wałęsa v. Poland, no. 50849/21, 23 November 2023; Wejrup v. Denmark (dec.), no. 49126/99, ECHR 2002 IV; Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396/95, § 43, ECHR 1999-VII; Wróbel v. Poland (dec.), § 30, 25 March 2025; Xhoxhaj v. Albania, no. 15227/19, § 363 in fine, 9 February 2021; Yaşar Kaplan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 56566/00, 24 September 2004; Żurek v. Poland, no. 39650/18, 16 June 2022

* Դատարանի PDF-ը կարող է պարունակել անձնական տվյալների պաշտոնական ծածկագրություն (սև շերտեր)։ Ամբողջական տեքստը հասանելի է վերևում «Ամբողջ Տեքստ» բաժնում։

Տեղեկանք

Ամսաթիվ:
5 փետրվարի, 2026 թ.
Գործի #:
46238/20
Դատարան:
Մարդու իրավունքների եվրոպական դատարան

Նմանատիպ գործեր

Գտեք նմանատիպ դատական ակտեր AI վերլուծությամբ

Վերլուծել