CASE OF SIC - SOCIEDADE INDEPENDENTE DE COMUNICAÇÃO, S.A v. PORTUGAL (No. 2) - [Ukrainian translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine

CASE OF SIC - SOCIEDADE INDEPENDENTE DE COMUNICAÇÃO, S.A v. PORTUGAL (No. 2) - [Ukrainian translation] summary by the Supreme Court of Ukraine Application No: 2746/21

Articles: 10, 10-1, 10-2

Respondent state: PRT

Date: 2026-01-13

Conclusion:

No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)

Subject classification: Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, §§ 78 95, ECHR 2012; Bédat v. Switzerland [GC], no. 56925/08, § 72, 29 March 2016; Bild GmbH & Co. KG v. Germany, no. 9602/18, § 28, 31 October 2023; Bohlen v. Germany, no. 53495/09, 19 February 2015; C8 (Canal 8) v. France, nos. 58951/18 and 1308/19, 9 February 2023; Cangı v. Turkey, no. 24973/15, § 42, 29 January 2019; Casado Coca v. Spain, 24 February 1994, Series A no. 285-A; Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556/94, § 34, ECHR 1999-IV; Couderc and Hachette Filipacchi Associés v. France [GC], no. 40454/07, ECHR 2015 (extracts); Flinkkilä and Others v. Finland, no. 25576/04, § 83, 6 April 2010; Hájovský v. Slovakia, no. 7796/16, §§ 34-35 and 49, 1 July 2021; I.V.Ț. v. Romania, no. 35582/15, § 48, 1 March 2022; Khural and Zeynalov v. Azerbaijan, no. 55069/11, § 54, 6 October 2022; Krone Verlag GmbH & Co. KG v. Austria (no. 3), no. 39069/97, §§ 19-20, ECHR 2003-XII; López Ribalda and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 1874/13 and 8567/13, §§ 87 and 89, 17 October 2019; markt intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann v. Germany, 20 November 1989, § 33, Series A no. 165; Mesić v. Croatia, no. 19362/18, § 93, 5 May 2022; Milisavljević v. Serbia, no. 50123/06, § 34, 4 April 2017; Minelli v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 14991/02, 14 June 2005; Mouvement raëlien suisse v Switzerland [GC], no. 16354/06, § 49, ECHR 2012 (extracts); Müller and Others v Switzerland, 24 May 1988, § 27, Series A no. 133; National Youth Council of Moldova v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 15379/13, § 78, 25 June 2024; Neij and Sunde Kolmisoppi v. Sweden (dec.), no. 40397/12, 19 February 2013; NIT S.R.L. v. the Republic of Moldova [GC], no. 28470/12, §§ 177 and 182, 5 April 2022; Paradiso and Campanelli v. Italy [GC], no. 25358/12, § 159, ECHR 2017; Peck v. the United Kingdom, no. 44647/98, § 85, ECHR 2003 I; Perinçek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510/08, § 124, ECHR 2015 (extracts); Petrenco v. Moldova, no. 20928/05, § 55, 30 March 2010; Sekmadienis Ltd. v. Lithuania, no. 69317/14, §§ 62 and 76, 30 January 2018; Sigma Radio Television Ltd v. Cyprus, nos. 32181/04 and 35122/05, §§ 204 and 208, 21 July 2011; Stancu and Others v. Romania, no. 22953/16, § 121, 18 October 2022; Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. 40660/08 and 60641/08, §§ 95 113, ECHR 2012