CASE OF MASTEY v. FRANCE

CASE OF MASTEY v. FRANCE

Application No: 30049/23

Articles: 35, 35-3-a, 6, 6-1

Respondent state: FRA

Date: 2026-04-30

Conclusion:

Remainder inadmissible (Art.

35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded; No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings; Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)

Subject classification: Ananyev v. Russia, no 20292/04, § 44, 30 July 2009; Boldea v. Romania, no 19997/02, § 30, 15 February 2007; Dijkhuizen v. the Netherlands, no 61591/16, § 58, 8 June 2021; Helle v. Finland, 19 December 1997, § 60, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VIII; Idalov v. Russia [GC], no 5826/03, 22 May 2012; Magnin v. France (dec.), no 26219/08, 10 May 2012; Marguš v. Croatia [GC], no 4455/10, 27 May 2014; Medenica v. Switzerland, no 20491/92, § 54, 14 June 2001; Moreira Ferreira v. Portugal (no 2) [GC], no 19867/12, § 84, 11 July 2017; Murtazaliyeva v. Russia [GC], no 36658/05, § 117, 18 December 2018; Nejjar v. Switzerland, no 9087/18, § 40, 11 December 2025; Ruiz Torija v. Spain, 9 December 1994, § 29, Series A no 303 A; Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland [GC], no 931/13, §§ 144 and 147, 27 June 2017; Ships Waste Oil Collector B.V. and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], nos. 2799/16 and 3 others, § 168, 1 April 2025; Simeonovi v. Bulgaria [GC], no 21980/04, 12 May 2017; Taxquet v. Belgium [GC], no 926/05, § 91, ECHR 2010; Wagner and J.M.W.L. v. Luxembourg, no 76240/01, § 96, 28 June 2007