CASE OF KANDEMİR v. TÜRKİYE

CASE OF KANDEMİR v. TÜRKİYE

Application No: 30906/19

Articles: 34, 35, 35-1, 6, 6-1, 41

Respondent state: TUR

Date: 2026-02-03

Conclusion:

Preliminary objection dismissed (Art.

34) Individual applications; (Art.

34) Victim; Remainder inadmissible (Art.

35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies; Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings; Article 6-1 - Fair hearing); Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction)

Subject classification: Al Dulimi and Montana Management Inv. v. Switzerland [GC], no 5809/08, § 128, 21 June 2016; Anna Maria Ciccone v. Italy, no 21492/17, § 73, 5 June 2025; Belošević v. Croatia, (dec.), no 57242/13, 3 December 2019; Centro Europa 7 S.r.l. and Di Stefano v. Italy [GC], no 38433/09, ECHR 2012; Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands, judgment of 27 October 1993, Series A no 274; Donadze v. Georgia, no 74644/01, § 32, 7 March 2006; Farzaliyev v. Azerbaijan, no 29620/07, § 55, 28 May 2020; Fernández Martínez v. Spain [GC], no 56030/07, §§ 109 and 110, ECHR 2014 (extracts); Fu Quan, s.r.o. v. the Czech Republic [GC], no 24827/14, 1 June 2023; Gross v. Switzerland [GC], no 67810/10, §§ 35 and 36, ECHR 2014; Kovačević v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], no 43651/22, § 131, 25 June 2025; Miroļubovs and Others v. Latvia, no 798/05, § 63, 15 September 2009; Mugoša v. Montenegro, no 76522/12, § 63, 21 June 2016; Onat and Others v. Türkiye, nos. 61590/19 and 6 others, 25 March 2025; Pişkin v. Turkey, no 33399/18, 15 December 2020; Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 117, 20 March 2018; Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e Sá v. Portugal [GC], nos. 55391/13 and 2 others, §§ 176-186, 6 November 2018; Regner v. the Czech Republic [GC], no 35289/11, § 121, 19 September 2017; Şeker v. Turkey (dec.), no 30330/19, 7 September 2021