CASE OF UKRAYINSKYY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Office of the Agent before the European Court of Human Rights

CASE OF UKRAYINSKYY AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE - [Ukrainian Translation] by the Office of the Agent before the European Court of Human Rights Application No: 48751/19, 61495/19, 61496/19, 61497/19, 61498/19, 61499/19, 61500/19, 61501/19, 61502/19, 61503/19, 61504/19, 61505/19, 61506/19, 61507/19, 61508/19, 61509/19, 61510/19, 61511/19, 61512/19, 61513/19, 61514/19, 61515/19, 61516/19, 61517/19, 61518/19, 61519/19, 61520/19, 61521/19, 61522/19, 61523/19, 61524/19, 61525/19, 61526/19, 61527/19, 61528/19, 61529/19, 61530/19, 61531/19, 61532/19, 61533/19, 61534/19, 61536/19 Articles: 35, 35-3-a, 34, 3, 13, 13+3, 41, 37, 37-1

Respondent state: UKR

Date: 2026-04-02

Conclusion:

Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art.

35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-3-a) Abuse of the right of application; Struck out of the list (Art.

37) Striking out applications-{general}; (Art. 37-1) Striking out applications; Violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article 34 - Hinder the exercise of the right of application); No violation of Article 34 - Individual applications (Article 34 - Hinder the exercise of the right of application); Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect); Violation of Article 13+3 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy) (Article 3 - Degrading treatment; Prohibition of torture); Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction)

Subject classification: Alimov v. Turkey, no. 14344/13, § 76, 6 September 2016; Amić and Others v. Croatia (dec.), nos. 21714/22, 25102/22 and 25367/22, §§ 120-25, 9 July 2024; Baryshev v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 17363/06, 14 September 2010; Batikyan v. Ukraine, nos. 56540/14 and 57252/14, § 113, 6 October 2022; Belyaev and Digtyar v. Ukraine, nos. 16984/04 and 9947/05, § 38, 16 February 2012; Bogdan Shevchuk v. Ukraine, no. 55737/16, § 49, 24 April 2025; Cannavacciuolo and Others v. Italy (nos. 51567/14 and 3 others, 30 January 2025; Cotleţ v. Romania, no. 38565/97, § 71, 3 June 2003; Davydov and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 17674/02 and 39081/02, § 337, 1 July 2010; Govorov v. Ukraine (dec.) [Committee], no. 20060/21, 2 February 2023; H.P. v. Denmark (dec.), no. 55607/09, § 85, 13 December 2016; İlerde and Others v. Türkiye, nos. 35614/19 and 10 others, §§ 48 and 97, 5 December 2023; Knyazev v. Russia, no. 25948/05, § 116, 8 November 2007; Konstantin Markin v. Russia [GC], no. 30078/06, § 90, ECHR 2012 (extracts); Kurt v. Turkey, no. 24276/94, Commission decision of 22 May 1995, Decisions and Reports 81-A, p. 112; Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006; Muršić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, ECHR 2016; N.D. and N.T. v. Spain [GC], nos. 8675/15 and 8697/15, 13 February 2020; Nagmetov v. Russia ([GC], no. 35589/08, §§ 78-82, 30 March 2017; Oferta Plus SRL v. Moldova, no. 14385/04, § 134, 19 December 2006; Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 124, 20 March 2018; Rodzevillo v. Ukraine, no. 38771/05, § 53, 14 January 2016; Rozgon v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 26122/08, 27 April 2010; Sergey Antonov v. Ukraine, no. 40512/13, §§ 105 10, 22 October 2015; Shirkhanyan v. Armenia (no. 54547/16, §§ 191-94, 22 February 2022; Sidjimov v. Bulgaria, no. 55057/00, §§ 25-31, 27 January 2005; Soproun v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 39402/02, 16 March 2010; Sparysh and Kutsman v. Ukraine [Committee], nos. 49709/18 and 49870/18, § 14, 12 September 2024; Sukachov v. Ukraine, no. 14057/17, 30 January 2020; Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 131, ECHR 1999-IV; Tehrani and Others v. Turkey, nos. 32940/08 and 2 others, §§ 53-57, 13 April 2010; V.M. and Others v. Belgium (striking out) [GC], no. 60125/11, §§ 35-40, 17 November 2016; Vitkovskiy v. Ukraine (no. 24938/06, §§ 119-22, 26 September 2013; Vladimir Sokolov v. Russia, no. 31242/05, § 81, 29 March 2011; Zambrano v. France (dec.), no. 41994/21, § 37, 21 September 2021