CASE OF R.M. v. FRANCE

CASE OF R.M. v. FRANCE

Application No: 34994/22

Articles: 35, 35-3-a, 3, 8, 8-1, 41

Respondent state: FRA

Date: 2026-01-15

Conclusion:

Remainder inadmissible (Art.

35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-3-a) Manifestly ill-founded; Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect); Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect); Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect); No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment) (Substantive aspect); Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations; Article 8-1 - Respect for private life); Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction)

Subject classification: Aleksandr Makarov v. Russia, no 15217/07, § 97, 12 March 2009; Canali v. France, no 40119/09, § 103, 25 April 2013; Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014; Iamandi v. Romania, no 25867/03, § 61, 1 June 2010; İlerde and Others v. Türkiye, nos. 35614/19 and 10 others, § 193-195, 5 December 2023; J.M.B. and Others v. France, nos. 9671/15 and 31 others, 30 January 2020; Muršić v. Croatia [GC], no 7334/13, 20 October 2016; Neshkov and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 36925/10 and 5 others, § 240, 27 January 2015; Nikitin and Others v. Estonia, nos. 23226/16 and 6 others, § 79, 29 January 2019; Petrescu v. Portugal, no 23190/17, § 110, 3 December 2019; Rezmiveș and Others v. Romania, nos. 61467/12 and 3 others, § 79, 25 April 2017; Ribár v. Slovakia, no 56545/21, § 98, 12 December 2024; Story and Others v. Malta, nos. 57005/13 and 57043/13, §§ 112-113, 29 October 2015; Szafrański v. Poland, no 17249/12, 15 December 2015