CASE OF MILADZE v. GEORGIA

CASE OF MILADZE v. GEORGIA

Application No: 41585/23

Articles: 10, 10-1, 10-2

Respondent state: GEO

Date: 2026-05-19

Conclusion:

No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression - {general} (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)

Subject classification: Amaghlobeli and Others v. Georgia, no. 41192/11, § 24 in fine, 20 May 2021; Association Ekin v. France, no. 39288/98, § 56, ECHR 2001-VIII; Avagyan v. Russia, no. 36911/20, §§ 31-37, 29 April 2025; B.A. v. Iceland, no. 17006/20, § 41, 26 August 2025; Bédat v. Switzerland [GC], no. 56925/08, § 79, 29 March 2016; Bouton v. France, no. 22636/19, §§ 53 54, 13 October 2022; Chauvy and Others v. France, no. 64915/01, § 70, ECHR 2004-VI; Chkhartishvili v. Georgia, no. 31349/20, § 60, 11 May 2023; Delfi AS v. Estonia [GC], no. 64569/09, §§ 110‑12, ECHR 2015; Egill Einarsson v. Iceland, no. 24703/15, § 46, 7 November 2017; Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 45, ECHR 1999-I; Gachechiladze v. Georgia, no. 2591/19, §§ 40-41, 22 July 2021; Gaspari v. Armenia (no. 2), no. 67783/13, § 31, 11 July 2023; Grebneva and Alisimchik v. Russia, no. 8918/05, § 52, 22 November 2016; Janowski v. Poland [GC], no. 25716/94, § 33, ECHR 1999‑I; Kilin v. Russia, no. 10271/12, § 71-94, 11 May 2021; Korolev v. Russia (dec.), no. 25551/05, ECHR 2010-V; Le Pen v. France (dec.), no. 18788/09, 20 April 2010; Mătăsaru v. the Republic of Moldova, nos. 69714/16 and 71685/16, § 35, 15 January 2019; Mehmet Çiftci v. Turkey, no. 53208/19, § 26, 16 November 2021; Melike v. Turkey, no. 35786/19, §§ 46-54, 15 June 2021; News Verlags GmbH & CoKG v. Austria, no. 31457/96, § 52, ECHR 2000-I; Oberschlick v. Austria (no. 1), 23 May 1991, § 57, Series A no. 204; Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom, 26 November 1991, § 59, Series A no. 216; Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955/06 and 3 others, § 57, ECHR 2011; Patrício Monteiro Telo de Abreu v. Portugal, no. 42713/15, §§ 42-45, 7 June 2022; Peradze and Others v. Georgia, no. 5631/16, 15 December 2022; Perinçek v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27510/08, §§ 131-33, ECHR 2015 (extracts); Perna v. Italy [GC], no. 48898/99, § 39, ECHR 2003-V; Roşiianu v. Romania, no. 27329/06, § 56, 24 June 2014; Sanchez v. France [GC], no. 45581/15, § 162, 15 May 2023; Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland [GC], no. 931/13, §§ 143-45, ECHR 2017 (extracts); Savva Terentyev v. Russia, no. 10692/09, 28 August 2018; Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no. 69698/01, § 153, ECHR 2007‑V; Străisteanu v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 9989/20, §§ 66-75, 5 June 2025; Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-IV; Uj v. Hungary, no. 23954/10, §§ 20 et 24, 19 July 2011; Vereinigung Bildender Künstler v. Austria, no. 68354/01, §§ 33-35, 25 January 2007; Wojczuk v. Poland, no. 52969/13, § 96, 9 December 2021; Zana v. Turkey, 25 November 1997, § 51, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VII; Ziembiński v. Poland (no. 2), no. 1799/07, § 45, 5 July 2016