CASE OF KARIČKOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

CASE OF KARIČKOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

Application No: 7411/24

Articles: 3, 14, 14+3, 41

Respondent state: CZE

Date: 2026-07-16

Conclusion:

Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect); Violation of Article 14+3 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 3 - Prohibition of torture; Effective investigation); Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction)

Subject classification: Abdu v. Bulgaria, no. 26827/08, § 23, 11 March 2014; Amadayev v. Russia, no. 18114/06, § 81, 3 July 2014; Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878/08, § 234, 30 March 2016; B.S. v. Spain, no. 47159/08, 24 July 2012; B.Ü. v. the Czech Republic, no. 9264/15, § 92, 6 October 2022; Balázs v. Hungary, no. 15529/12, 20 October 2015; Beizaras and Levickas v. Lithuania, no. 41288/15, § 129, 14 January 2020; Bekos and Koutropoulos v. Greece, no. 15250/02, § 69, ECHR 2005-XIII; Cobzaru v. Romania, no. 48254/99, § 111, 26 July 2007; H.F. and Others v. France [GC], nos. 24384/19 and 44234/20, § 291, 14 September 2022; I.C. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 36436/22, 27 February 2025; Identoba and Others v. Georgia, no. 73235/12, § 65, 12 May 2015; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 120, ECHR 2000-IV; Moldovan and Others v. Romania (no. 2), nos. 41138/98 and 64320/01, §§ 17-19, 139, ECHR 2005 VII (extracts); Mustafa Tunç and Fecire Tunç v. Turkey [GC], no. 24014/05, § 175, 14 April 2015; Stoica v. Romania, no. 42722/02, 4 March 2008; V.I. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 38963/18, §§ 188-92, 26 March 2024; X and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 22457/16, 2 February 2021; X v. Cyprus, no. 40733/22, §§ 119-120, 27 February 2025