CASE OF OÜ PAREM KALLAS v. ESTONIA

CASE OF OÜ PAREM KALLAS v. ESTONIA

Application No: 18440/23

Articles: 35, 35-1, P1-1, P1-1-1

Respondent state: EST

Date: 2026-06-02

Conclusion:

Remainder inadmissible (Art.

35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies; No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions)

Subject classification: Ališić and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Slovenia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 60642/08, § 108, ECHR 2014; Beyeler v. Italy [GC], no. 33202/96, § 114, ECHR 2000-I; Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, ECHR 2004-V; Former King of Greece and Others v. Greece [GC], no. 25701/94, § 89, ECHR 2000-XII; Kutlu and Others v. Turkey, no. 51861/11, §§ 55-58, 13 December 2016; Lupeni Greek Catholic Parish and Others v. Romania [GC], no. 76943/11, § 90, 29 November 2016; Öneryıldız v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, § 134, ECHR 2004-XII; OÜ Parem Kallas v. Estonia (dec.) [Committee], no. 56002/19, § 13, 5 July 2022; Schembri and Others v. Malta, no. 42583/06, § 38, 10 November 2009; Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine, no. 48553/99, § 96, ECHR 2002-VII; Szkórits v. Hungary, no. 58171/09, §§ 37-39, 16 September 2014; Vistiņš and Perepjolkins v. Latvia [GC], no. 71243/01, §§ 110 and 114, ECHR 2014; Vučković and Others v. Serbia (preliminary objection) [GC], nos. 17153/11 and 29 others, § 74, 25 March 2014