CASE OF M.A. v. FRANCE

CASE OF M.A. v. FRANCE

Application No: 34324/24

Articles: 35, 35-1, 8, 8-1, 8-2, 41

Respondent state: FRA

Date: 2026-03-19

Conclusion:

Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Art.

35) Admissibility criteria; (Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies; Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life); Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage; Just satisfaction)

Subject classification: B. v. Belgium, no 4320/11, §§ 70-72, 10 July 2012; Byčenko v. Lithuania, no 10477/21, §§ 78-79, 14 February 2023; G.M. v. France, no 25075/18, § 45, 9 December 2021; Kozacıoğlu v. Turkey [GC], no 2334/03, § 40, 19 February 2009; Lacombe v. France, no 23941/14, § 46, 10 October 2019; M. and M. v. Croatia, no 10161/13, § 171, ECHR 2015 (extracts); M.K. v. Greece, no 51312/16, §§ 74 and 91, 1 February 2018; M.P. and Others v. Greece, no 2068/24, § 58, 9 September 2025; Maumousseau and Washington v. France, no 39388/05, 6 December 2007; Neulinger and Shuruk v. Switzerland [GC], no 41615/07, §§ 147-149, ECHR 2010; Omorefe v. Spain, no 69339/16, § 39, 23 June 2020; S.N. and M.B.N. v. Switzerland, no 12937/20, § 100, 23 November 2021; Schmidt v. France, no 35109/02, § 115, 26 July 2007; Thévenon v. France (dec.), no 46061/21, § 61, 13 September 2022; Veres v. Spain, no 57906/18, § 79, 8 November 2022; Verhoeven v. France, no 19664/20, 28 March 2024; Vladimir Ushakov v. Russia, no 15122/17, § 83, 18 June 2019; X v. Latvia [GC], no 27853/09, ECHR 2013